This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [GSoC] generation of Gimple loops with empty bodies
- From: Roman Gareev <gareevroman at gmail dot com>
- To: Tobias Grosser <tobias at grosser dot es>
- Cc: Mircea Namolaru <mircea dot namolaru at inria dot fr>, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2014 17:11:51 +0600
- Subject: Re: [GSoC] generation of Gimple loops with empty bodies
- Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
- References: <CABGF_geT79UYTzybL1Sjchwn-UyCKXDuaTjFa60jj5oG9qoJ4A at mail dot gmail dot com> <53BA804B dot 7050704 at grosser dot es> <CABGF_gcs1qPGu+H2fjCnKqnP3=sH3etWkf3vynrgyiDD9qJhmA at mail dot gmail dot com> <53BBEFB8 dot 2070308 at grosser dot es> <CABGF_gc3-gg4cmLuRhq4pHanPE2icUXKSmvjyWtPqK6SkTP6pg at mail dot gmail dot com> <53BFABF2 dot 10907 at grosser dot es>
> The struct now contains only a single element such that there seems to be no
> need for it anymore. Should we remove it? (We could still use a typedef if
> you believe the datatype is too long).
I don't mind removing it. However I think that we should choose the
way of transferring of sese region, which is used for translation of
an isl_ast_node_user to Gimple code. Should we transfer it separately
or restore ivs_params later? What do you think?
--
Cheers, Roman Gareev.