This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [PATCH] typeof: Remove type qualifiers for atomic types


On 06/25/2014 05:56 PM, Joseph S. Myers wrote:
On Wed, 25 Jun 2014, Sebastian Huber wrote:

2014-06-25  Sebastian Huber  <sebastian.huber@embedded-brains.de>

	* c-parser.c (c_parser_declaration_or_fndef): Discard all type
	qualifiers in __auto_type for atomic types.
	(c_parser_typeof_specifier): Discard all type qualifiers in
	__typeof__ for atomic types.
This patch should include a testcase that typeof is discarding volatile
(you can e.g. declare an extern variable twice, once as int and once as
typeof (*p) where p is volatile _Atomic int *, so the type compatibility
check fails unless volatile is discarded).


Would be something like this all right for the check?

#define CHECK_CORRESPONDING(TYPE1, TYPE2) \
do { TYPE1 a; TYPE2 *b = &a; TYPE2 c; TYPE1 *d = &c; } while (0)

void f(void)
{
const int *ci;
volatile int *vi;
CHECK_CORRESPONDING(int *, __typeof__(ci));
CHECK_CORRESPONDING(int *, __typeof__(vi));
}

It generates warnings:

test.c: In function ‘f’:
test.c:8:2: warning: initialization from incompatible pointer type [enabled by default] test.c:8:2: warning: initialization from incompatible pointer type [enabled by default] test.c:9:2: warning: initialization from incompatible pointer type [enabled by default] test.c:9:2: warning: initialization from incompatible pointer type [enabled by default]

It is similar to:

gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/c99-stdint-3.c

I think its not possible to write a test for the restrict, since it cannot be part of a type?

--
Sebastian Huber, embedded brains GmbH

Address : Dornierstr. 4, D-82178 Puchheim, Germany
Phone   : +49 89 189 47 41-16
Fax     : +49 89 189 47 41-09
E-Mail  : sebastian.huber@embedded-brains.de
PGP     : Public key available on request.

Diese Nachricht ist keine geschäftliche Mitteilung im Sinne des EHUG.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]