This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [C++11, C++14 PATCH 2/3] Support for SD-6: SG10 Feature Test Recommendations - c-family and testsuite

From: Marc Glisse <marc dot glisse at inria dot fr>
To: Ed Smith-Rowland <3dw4rd at verizon dot net>
Cc: gcc-patches <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>, Jason Merrill <jason at redhat dot com>
Date: Sat, 31 May 2014 08:30:10 +0200 (CEST)
Subject: Re: [C++11, C++14 PATCH 2/3] Support for SD-6: SG10 Feature Test Recommendations - c-family and testsuite
Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
References: <53894FCF dot 1000802 at verizon dot net>
Reply-to: gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org

On Fri, 30 May 2014, Ed Smith-Rowland wrote:

+	  cpp_undef (pfile, "__cpp_constexpr");
+	  cpp_define (pfile, "__cpp_constexpr=201304");

Could you set the other value in an else branch to avoid a def undef redefgame?

Also, I am pretty sure that gcc doesn't support the latest constexpr, weshouldn't define those macros lightly.


--
Marc Glisse

References:
- [C++11, C++14 PATCH 2/3] Support for SD-6: SG10 Feature Test Recommendations - c-family and testsuite
  - From: Ed Smith-Rowland

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]