This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [C++ Patch] PR 57543
- From: Jason Merrill <jason at redhat dot com>
- To: Paolo Carlini <paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com>, "gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- Date: Thu, 29 May 2014 09:34:37 -0400
- Subject: Re: [C++ Patch] PR 57543
- Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
- References: <5384935D dot 5020406 at oracle dot com> <5384C817 dot 9010004 at redhat dot com> <5385064C dot 9020203 at oracle dot com> <53850C1F dot 7020902 at oracle dot com> <5385B756 dot 8070707 at oracle dot com> <5385FD69 dot 6020000 at redhat dot com> <538602EF dot 9060605 at oracle dot com> <53860589 dot 5040106 at redhat dot com> <538607DF dot 8060702 at oracle dot com> <53860FE6 dot 8050207 at redhat dot com> <53861796 dot 7070309 at oracle dot com>
On 05/28/2014 01:06 PM, Paolo Carlini wrote:
Now, I got this "insane" idea: would it make sense to simply invert the
substitutions (args and return) unconditionally?
If we're going to change the order, I want to do it in a more correct,
rather than differently wrong, way. DR 1227 clarified that substitution
should proceed in lexical order.
http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/cwg_defects.html#1227
Jason