This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [PATCH] Add support for GNU/Hurd in gnat-4.9
- From: Svante Signell <svante dot signell at gmail dot com>
- To: Samuel Thibault <samuel dot thibault at gnu dot org>
- Cc: Arnaud Charlet <charlet at adacore dot com>, Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou at adacore dot com>, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org, debian-ada <debian-ada at lists dot debian dot org>, Thomas Schwinge <thomas at codesourcery dot com>
- Date: Wed, 21 May 2014 10:20:16 +0200
- Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add support for GNU/Hurd in gnat-4.9
- Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
- References: <1398426914 dot 568 dot 111 dot camel at G3620 dot my dot own dot domain> <1713255 dot Hcx8ZbPfnP at polaris> <1400501935 dot 4830 dot 33 dot camel at G3620 dot my dot own dot domain> <20140519125059 dot GC1412 at adacore dot com> <1400507259 dot 4830 dot 40 dot camel at G3620 dot my dot own dot domain> <20140519135318 dot GA18851 at adacore dot com> <1400509438 dot 4830 dot 45 dot camel at G3620 dot my dot own dot domain> <20140519142541 dot GA876 at adacore dot com> <1400658599 dot 4830 dot 92 dot camel at G3620 dot my dot own dot domain> <20140521080340 dot GY5623 at type dot youpi dot perso dot aquilenet dot fr>
- Reply-to: svante dot signell at gmail dot com
On Wed, 2014-05-21 at 10:03 +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> Svante Signell, le Wed 21 May 2014 09:49:59 +0200, a écrit :
> > Thomas and Samuel: It looks like upstream don't accept patches unless a
> > Hurd port maintainer commits to it. What's the use of all this job?
> Well, simply to keep the changes working. That is not surprising at all.
I might not be interested any longer with this kind of requirements.
What kind of person do you have to be to be accepted, a GNU/Hurd
developer or a GNU/Ada developer having a gnu.org account? Then you or
Thomas can commit to this and I'll try to help out.
> > (Of course it can at least run on Debian systems if/when accepted.)
> Sure, but will it continue working on the long term? That's the concern
> of upstream.
I think the majority of work has bee done, Now that patch will change
slightly for every missing feature added to Hurd.
> In principle it's just a matter of fixing just a few things over the
> coming versions. But someone has to do it, otherwise the port will just
I wonder ho the kfreebsd people managed to get accepted upstream?