This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [PATCH] Provide inlining context in strict-overflow warnings


On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 9:27 PM, Florian Weimer <fweimer@redhat.com> wrote:
> Patterns that trigger the optimization and warning can form after inlining,
> and it can be rather difficult to figure out what exactly is causing the
> warning.  The inlining context at least provides additional hints, enabling
> developers to substitute the arguments and discover what, precisely, is
> happening.
>
> More context is provided with -g than without, but I think this is
> acceptable.
>
> I bootstrapped and tested the attached patch on x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu,
> with no new regressions.

I think that your block walking code is bogus in that it looks at
only BLOCK_SOURCE_LOCATION, exposing an implementation
detail that should be hidden by using inlined_function_outer_scope_p.

It also will print an unlimited call stack - isn't that too verbose?

Thanks,
Richard.



> --
> Florian Weimer / Red Hat Product Security Team


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]