This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: RFA: More uses of wi:: instead of const_binop


On May 10, 2014, at 12:29 PM, Richard Sandiford <rdsandiford@googlemail.com> wrote:
> Following on from the patch for PR61136, this patch avoids some other
> uses of const_binop in which we know both operands are INTEGER_CSTs
> and where a wi:: routine would do.  As before, the idea is to avoid
> creating an INTEGER_CST only to test whether it's zero.

> OK to install?

Ok.

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]