This is the mail archive of the mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [PATCH 00/89] Compile-time gimple-checking

On Fri, 2014-05-02 at 10:02 -0600, Jeff Law wrote:
> On 05/02/14 03:09, Richard Biener wrote:
> >
> > Well, I'd like to see both and one affects the other. Doing the const correctness thing first seems more natural to me.
> > Of course both need to wait for 4.9.1.
> Well, it looks like David is already on that path to some extent with 
> the proposed gengtype changes.
> I guess I'm just trying to figure out how to stage this stuff in.  ie, 
> is it easier to go with the #89 patchkit, then followup with fixing the 
> const stuff, or is it easier to first fix the const stuff, then adjust 
> the #89 kit.  You're recommending the latter, which is fine with me, but 
> I'd like David to chime in as well since he's doing the work :-)

I'm about 4 or 5 hours from having patches I can post :)

[my automated typedef-removal script seems to work, but I need to write
some ChangeLogs and port one of the patches from the #89 kit, then

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]