This is the mail archive of the mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: wide-int, cfg

On Nov 25, 2013, at 2:57 AM, Richard Biener <> wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 23, 2013 at 8:21 PM, Mike Stump <> wrote:
>> Richi has asked the we break the wide-int patch so that the individual port and front end maintainers can review their parts without have to go through the entire patch.    This patch covers the cfg code.
>> Ok?
> Hmm, this is an example of a wide_int (a widest_int) being used inside
> a structure with long lifetime.  With the patch there are two of those
> per loop plus up to one per statement in a loop body (quadratic in
> the loop depth).

> Now, for the number-of-iterations stuff I really would like to keep things
> cheaper in some way or another.  Shrinking MAX_BITSIZE_MODE_ANY_INT
> would be the easiest improvement for x86_64.

> That said, I'd like this to be addressed.

The port can limit the size like so:

/* Keep the OI and XI modes from confusing the compiler into thinking
   that these modes could actually be used for computation.  They are
   only holders for vectors during data movement.  */

and that is now done on x86.


A copy of the patch is below (unchanged)...

Attachment: wide-int-cfg.diffs.txt
Description: Text document

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]