This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: version typeinfo for 128bit types
- From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely dot gcc at gmail dot com>
- To: Marc Glisse <marc dot glisse at inria dot fr>
- Cc: gcc-patches <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>, "libstdc++" <libstdc++ at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2014 15:11:23 +0100
- Subject: Re: version typeinfo for 128bit types
- Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
- References: <alpine dot DEB dot 2 dot 02 dot 1404140912130 dot 27139 at stedding dot saclay dot inria dot fr> <CAH6eHdSHs=sGMTaM_s265OAr2TaZGMFObmWfgG1Qzukx4aA__A at mail dot gmail dot com> <CAH6eHdSGqdrewAkCZAhUmtNEeRaBzUn4S0sw_Htv09e8TiCm-Q at mail dot gmail dot com> <alpine dot DEB dot 2 dot 10 dot 1404221553550 dot 3704 at laptop-mg dot saclay dot inria dot fr>
On 22 April 2014 14:55, Marc Glisse wrote:
> On Tue, 22 Apr 2014, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
>
>> On 14 April 2014 11:28, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
>>>
>>> On 14 April 2014 10:39, Marc Glisse wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> PR libstdc++/43622
>>>> * config/abi/pre/gnu.ver (CXXABI_1.3.9): New version, new
>>>> symbols.
>>>> * config/abi/pre/gnu-versioned-namespace.ver: New symbols.
>>>> * config/abi/post/x86_64-linux-gnu/baseline_symbols.txt:
>>>> Likewise.
>>>
>>>
>>> I'd like to wait until 4.9.0 has been released before adding new
>>> versions to the library, to avoid unnecessary differences between
>>> trunk and the 4.9.0 release candidate(s).
>>
>>
>> I was about to say the patch is OK for trunk now, but noticed that the
>> new CXXABI_1.3.9 block is added after the CXXABI_TM one, not after
>> CXXABI_1.3.8 ... was that intentional?
>
>
> I don't have any opinion, I'll move it just after 1.3.8 if that seems more
> logical to you.
Yes, I think so. The library changes are OK with that tweak - thanks!