This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: LTO / invoke.texi: Add some words about static libraries and LTO
- From: Gerald Pfeifer <gerald at pfeifer dot com>
- To: Tobias Burnus <burnus at net-b dot de>
- Cc: gcc-patches <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>, Richard Biener <richard dot guenther at gmail dot com>
- Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2014 20:40:53 -0700 (PDT)
- Subject: Re: LTO / invoke.texi: Add some words about static libraries and LTO
- Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
- References: <532D9FD3 dot 8030605 at net-b dot de>
On Sat, 22 Mar 2014, Tobias Burnus wrote:
> Mention gcc-ar, gcc-ranlib, gcc-nm in the documentation.
>
> OK?
This looks okay to me, except for
In order to make a static library suitable for both LTO optimization
and usual linkage, compile its object files with @option{-flto}
@code{-ffat-lto-objects}.
where I don't understand why its @option first and @code second.
And lines appear a bit long.
Gerald