This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [PATCH] [MIPS] Fix operands for microMIPS SW16, SH16 and SB16
- From: Richard Sandiford <rdsandiford at googlemail dot com>
- To: "Moore\, Catherine" <Catherine_Moore at mentor dot com>
- Cc: Matthew Fortune <Matthew dot Fortune at imgtec dot com>, "gcc-patches\ at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>, "rguenther\ at suse dot de" <rguenther at suse dot de>, "jakub\ at redhat dot com" <jakub at redhat dot com>
- Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2014 15:42:44 +0100
- Subject: Re: [PATCH] [MIPS] Fix operands for microMIPS SW16, SH16 and SB16
- Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
- References: <FD3DCEAC5B03E9408544A1E416F1124201497ED8A4 at NA-MBX-04 dot mgc dot mentorg dot com> <6D39441BF12EF246A7ABCE6654B023534E17E5 at LEMAIL01 dot le dot imgtec dot org> <87zjjrxb11 dot fsf at talisman dot default> <87r452ygnm dot fsf at talisman dot default> <FD3DCEAC5B03E9408544A1E416F1124201497F2EB9 at NA-MBX-04 dot mgc dot mentorg dot com>
"Moore, Catherine" <Catherine_Moore@mentor.com> writes:
>> Adding a new register class is definitely a bit invasive for this
>> stage of 4.9.
>> OTOH microMIPS is a new feature and it would be good to have it working in
>> 4.9.0. Since the testing suggests that the patch really doesn't affect non-
>> microMIPS code, I'd like it to go in 4.9 now.
>> Richard, Jakub, would that be OK?
>>
> Okay, understood. Will wait to hear.
The decision on IRC was that this is too invasive for 4.9.0 at this stage.
It would probably be going in without another release candidate before
the release.
Thanks,
Richard