This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: Patch ping
- From: Jakub Jelinek <jakub at redhat dot com>
- To: Jeff Law <law at redhat dot com>
- Cc: Richard Biener <rguenther at suse dot de>, Kirill Yukhin <kirill dot yukhin at gmail dot com>, Uros Bizjak <ubizjak at gmail dot com>, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2014 12:56:05 +0200
- Subject: Re: Patch ping
- Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
- References: <20140113080711 dot GS892 at tucnak dot redhat dot com> <52D402FF dot 5020003 at redhat dot com> <20140113152059 dot GZ892 at tucnak dot redhat dot com> <52D404C7 dot 1090002 at redhat dot com>
- Reply-to: Jakub Jelinek <jakub at redhat dot com>
On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 08:22:47AM -0700, Jeff Law wrote:
> On 01/13/14 08:20, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> >On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 08:15:11AM -0700, Jeff Law wrote:
> >>On 01/13/14 01:07, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> >>>I'd like to ping 2 patches:
> >>>
> >>>http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-01/msg00140.html
> >>>- Ensure GET_MODE_{SIZE,INNER,NUNITS} (const) is constant rather than
> >>> memory load after optimization (I'd like to keep the current <MODE_SIZE>
> >>> patch for the reasons mentioned there, but also add this patch)
> >>I'd tend to think this is 4.10/5.0 material. Unless (for example),
> >>you've got a PR where this makes a significant difference in compile
> >>time.
> >
> >Ok, will defer it then.
> THanks. I've put in my queued folder as well ;-)
Is this ok now for stage1?
Jakub