This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [PATCH] Update ia64 libstdc++ baseline symbols
- From: Andreas Schwab <schwab at suse dot de>
- To: Jakub Jelinek <jakub at redhat dot com>
- Cc: gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org, libstdc++ at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2014 10:15:59 +0200
- Subject: Re: [PATCH] Update ia64 libstdc++ baseline symbols
- Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
- References: <mvmbnw94o58 dot fsf at hawking dot suse dot de> <20140410075545 dot GR1817 at tucnak dot redhat dot com>
Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com> writes:
> On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 09:52:35AM +0200, Andreas Schwab wrote:
>> Tested on ia64-suse-linux and installed as obvious.
>
> Please don't add the TLS symbols in there, they aren't included
> in any of the linux baselines
Actually, there are some:
libstdc++-v3/config/abi/post/alpha-linux-gnu/baseline_symbols.txt
libstdc++-v3/config/abi/post/m68k-linux-gnu/baseline_symbols.txt
libstdc++-v3/config/abi/post/mips64-linux-gnu/32/baseline_symbols.txt
libstdc++-v3/config/abi/post/mips64-linux-gnu/64/baseline_symbols.txt
libstdc++-v3/config/abi/post/mips64-linux-gnu/baseline_symbols.txt
libstdc++-v3/config/abi/post/solaris2.10/amd64/baseline_symbols.txt
libstdc++-v3/config/abi/post/solaris2.10/baseline_symbols.txt
libstdc++-v3/config/abi/post/solaris2.10/sparcv9/baseline_symbols.txt
libstdc++-v3/config/abi/post/x86_64-linux-gnu/x32/baseline_symbols.txt
Should they all be removed (including the solaris ones)?
Andreas.
--
Andreas Schwab, SUSE Labs, schwab@suse.de
GPG Key fingerprint = 0196 BAD8 1CE9 1970 F4BE 1748 E4D4 88E3 0EEA B9D7
"And now for something completely different."