This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [PATCH, PR58066] preferred_stack_boundary update for tls expanded call
- From: Wei Mi <wmi at google dot com>
- To: "H.J. Lu" <hjl dot tools at gmail dot com>
- Cc: GCC Patches <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>, David Li <davidxl at google dot com>, Uros Bizjak <ubizjak at gmail dot com>
- Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2014 14:51:17 -0700
- Subject: Re: [PATCH, PR58066] preferred_stack_boundary update for tls expanded call
- Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
- References: <CA+4CFy5BdB2=mnd=o+8GmQ5EBtJfGUFB-0AKFou2xMHvekCAJw at mail dot gmail dot com> <CAMe9rOrrF5zTYh6=KoKcmNDZYi_oirh6SNC+_JdCY4U6NpBMTQ at mail dot gmail dot com> <CA+4CFy7SHAHmEmreq+GsTzA9nYnWiSG_Fut_fs16BnFH+LOQow at mail dot gmail dot com> <CAMe9rOpG8N8YPA=dHMDq7fL6Kyn1PU1-RrD6bqBjHFUOfz7n9Q at mail dot gmail dot com> <CA+4CFy79py1XrgDygpRg9j4ZLz9waKMKkoAvvA_QnN6M7usCaA at mail dot gmail dot com> <CAMe9rOqdN=ebqYnN7skYzJF5sEK0Q_2rAX1SQ=hWouZtUaqJGw at mail dot gmail dot com> <CA+4CFy7wt4EKUwQAQ8zqP=gbVwAZmUu57oKNxjvyNRfkYoPdPw at mail dot gmail dot com> <CAMe9rOrOXkKB99AzmMsmHEPQENG=tUhqBoNEW+s_6E2MAL+c-A at mail dot gmail dot com>
Oh, I see. Thanks!
Wei.
On Wed, Mar 12, 2014 at 2:42 PM, H.J. Lu <hjl.tools@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 12, 2014 at 2:36 PM, Wei Mi <wmi@google.com> wrote:
>> Hi H.J.,
>>
>> Could you show me why you postpone the setting
>> ix86_tls_descriptor_calls_expanded_in_cfun until reload_complete and
>> use ix86_tls_descriptor_calls_expanded_in_cfun instead of
>> ix86_current_function_calls_tls_descriptor? Isn't
>> ix86_current_function_calls_tls_descriptor useful to consider the case
>> that tls call is optimized away?
>>
>
> When a tls call is optimized away, it won't survive reload.
> If it does survive reload, it isn't optimized away. Also
> checking df_regs_ever_live_p (SP_REG) isn't reliable
> when called from ix86_compute_frame_layout.
>
> --
> H.J.