This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [wwwdocs] RFC - mention Cilk Plus in the GCC 4.9 release notes
- From: Gerald Pfeifer <gerald at pfeifer dot com>
- To: Tobias Burnus <burnus at net-b dot de>
- Cc: gcc-patches <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>, "Iyer, Balaji V" <balaji dot v dot iyer at intel dot com>, Jakub Jelinek <jakub at redhat dot com>
- Date: Sat, 8 Mar 2014 19:29:18 +0100 (CET)
- Subject: Re: [wwwdocs] RFC - mention Cilk Plus in the GCC 4.9 release notes
- Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
- References: <531B60A4 dot 7050209 at net-b dot de>
On Sat, 8 Mar 2014, Tobias Burnus wrote:
> the attached patch mentions the support of Cilk Plus in GCC 4.9 in the
> release notes, http://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-4.9/changes.html
>
> Is the patch OK?
"Plus is an extension...", should this read "Cilk Plus is an extension?"
If so, I suggest to switch the second and third sentences: first explain
what it is, then go into specifics such as ABI.
Looks good to me otherwise (modulo the ABI question I cannot answer :-).
Gerald