This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [PATCH] _Cilk_for for C and C++
- From: Marek Polacek <polacek at redhat dot com>
- To: Aldy Hernandez <aldyh at redhat dot com>
- Cc: "Iyer, Balaji V" <balaji dot v dot iyer at intel dot com>, Jakub Jelinek <jakub at redhat dot com>, Jason Merrill <jason at redhat dot com>, "'Jeff Law'" <law at redhat dot com>, "'gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org'" <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>, "'rth at redhat dot com'" <rth at redhat dot com>
- Date: Fri, 17 Jan 2014 10:24:47 +0100
- Subject: Re: [PATCH] _Cilk_for for C and C++
- Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
- References: <BF230D13CA30DD48930C31D4099330003A4B2148 at FMSMSX101 dot amr dot corp dot intel dot com> <52AF6EE8 dot 2080807 at redhat dot com> <BF230D13CA30DD48930C31D4099330003A4B2BA2 at FMSMSX101 dot amr dot corp dot intel dot com> <52CC6657 dot 3000500 at redhat dot com> <BF230D13CA30DD48930C31D4099330003A4B866E at FMSMSX101 dot amr dot corp dot intel dot com> <20140107212911 dot GA892 at tucnak dot redhat dot com> <BF230D13CA30DD48930C31D4099330003A4B86D5 at FMSMSX101 dot amr dot corp dot intel dot com> <20140108173106 dot GJ892 at tucnak dot redhat dot com> <BF230D13CA30DD48930C31D4099330003A4B8C5B at FMSMSX101 dot amr dot corp dot intel dot com> <52D84CC3 dot 8000700 at redhat dot com>
On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 01:18:59PM -0800, Aldy Hernandez wrote:
> I'm not a C++ expert, but my understanding was that in C++ you don't
> need a typedef to use the following structure by name
> (cilk_for_information). So you can just declare "struct
> cilk_for_information {...}" and instantiate it with just
> "cilk_for_information some_instance". If that's the case, get rid
> of typedef.
Yes. That's what create_implicit_typedef does.
Marek