This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: libsanitizer merge from upstream r196090
- From: Maxim Ostapenko <m dot ostapenko at partner dot samsung dot com>
- To: Jakub Jelinek <jakub at redhat dot com>, Uros Bizjak <ubizjak at gmail dot com>
- Cc: "gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>, "H.J. Lu" <hjl dot tools at gmail dot com>, Konstantin Serebryany <konstantin dot s dot serebryany at gmail dot com>, Dodji Seketeli <dodji at redhat dot com>, Marek Polacek <polacek at redhat dot com>, Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov at google dot com>, Yury Gribov <y dot gribov at samsung dot com>, Slava Garbuzov <v dot garbuzov at samsung dot com>
- Date: Fri, 10 Jan 2014 15:50:33 +0400
- Subject: Re: libsanitizer merge from upstream r196090
- Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
- References: <CAFULd4ZrFy-o7GmDh31WRpoxiYwwLpaAY6pOtxCZ9i-+4kfv1A at mail dot gmail dot com> <CAFULd4bwGUWk0zSvkgDfRXzbeHXwUq8xatuDa26NnqrdUU5nbw at mail dot gmail dot com> <20140110093912 dot GT892 at tucnak dot redhat dot com>
Hi all,
On Fri, Jan 10, 2014 at 10:39 AM, Jakub Jelinek<jakub@redhat.com> wrote:
> Some of the tsan tests seems to FAIL randomly for quite a while
> (since they were added), didn't have time to look if it is just bugs
in the test or
> some compiler issue or library issue.
When I've commited these tsan tests, all of them were passed on my
x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu 64bit system.
Should I review them more carefully?
-Maxim.