Re: [Patch] libgcov.c re-factoring

[Andrew MacLeod <amacleod at redhat dot com>]

On 12/22/2013 01:27 PM, Jan Hubicka wrote:
> I believe when the code was created by moving it from elsehwre, the copyright should say
> original date of gcov-io.h.
> > +
> > +#include "tconfig.h"
> > +#include "tsystem.h"
> > +#include "coretypes.h"
> > +#include "tm.h"
> > +#include "libgcc_tm.h"
> ....
> I would really like someone working on header restructuring to comment on
> those.
> I am not 100% sure what our best practices currently are in respect of
> including headers within headers and specially after good amount of
> defines like gcov-io.h gets included.
Just back..

For the moment the goal with headers is to completely flatten them.. ie, 
we do not want to include header files from header files.  Once there is 
a sensible restructuring of things in place, we are likely to 
reintroduce them in a controlled and sensible manner.

So at the moment, I'd like to not include any additional .h files from 
within .h files...

Andrew