This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
RE: [PATCH] Strict volatile bit-fields clean-up, Take 2
- From: Bernd Edlinger <bernd dot edlinger at hotmail dot de>
- To: Richard Biener <richard dot guenther at gmail dot com>
- Cc: Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou at adacore dot com>, "gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- Date: Fri, 6 Dec 2013 12:14:20 +0100
- Subject: RE: [PATCH] Strict volatile bit-fields clean-up, Take 2
- Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
- References: <DUB122-W2205631605E094F653823BE4D50 at phx dot gbl>,<CAFiYyc1RMx4e=aicQ6RFKH0JZCp+551c0jdDYzffqdHiRMomcw at mail dot gmail dot com>,<DUB122-W468B85D52A23B0AE028D7AE4D70 at phx dot gbl>,<CAFiYyc1xc5qbBBzzSzOhRd7gTgjgciU9zib_0zAv_OMm83vPuw at mail dot gmail dot com>,<DUB122-W4154B10339845953A002C1E4D60 at phx dot gbl>,<CAFiYyc3QLoVGJwpgwCF2_XwFLsXw+1Qbe_qdbt_fqxiN_6NaXA at mail dot gmail dot com>
Richard,
> Note I just want to help as well and I am not very familiar with
> the details of the implementation here. So I'd rather have
> a patch "obviously correct" to me - which expanding a condition
> by several more checks isn't ;)
>
Thanks a lot, I understand that very well. Any help is welcome.
I will think about your recommendations and try to come up with
a new version next week.
Wish you a nice weekend,
Bernd.