This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [ping] [patch] contrib/config-list.mk: Allow to build all targets individually
- From: Michael Eager <eager at eagerm dot com>
- To: Jan-Benedict Glaw <jbglaw at lug-owl dot de>
- Cc: gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Sat, 30 Nov 2013 08:56:32 -0800
- Subject: Re: [ping] [patch] contrib/config-list.mk: Allow to build all targets individually
- Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
- References: <20131124190243 dot GL30563 at lug-owl dot de> <20131127014308 dot GX30563 at lug-owl dot de>
On 11/26/13 17:43, Jan-Benedict Glaw wrote:
On Sun, 2013-11-24 20:02:43 +0100, Jan-Benedict Glaw <jbglaw@lug-owl.de> wrote:
2013-11-24 Jan-Benedict Glaw <jbglaw@lug-owl.de>
* config-list.mk (host_options): Allow to override it.
(LIST): Change "=" to "EQUAL".
(list): New target listing all configurations.
($(LIST)): Substitute "EQUAL" back to "=".
Ping: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2013-11/msg03121.html
Additional to that, I'd suggest to also add microblazeel-elf and
microblaze-rtems (cf. http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2013-11/msg00547.html
and http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2013-11/msg00545.html), though Joern
isn't fond of the idea (cf.
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2013-11/msg00528.html). So I'd quite like to
see a discussion about this.
I have no objections to adding the two targets.
I think that microblaze-rtems will duplicate microblaze-elf.
--
Michael Eager eager@eagercon.com
1960 Park Blvd., Palo Alto, CA 94306 650-325-8077