This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [patch] introduce aarch64 as a Go architecture
- From: Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gmail dot com>
- To: Matthias Klose <doko at ubuntu dot com>
- Cc: Ian Lance Taylor <iant at google dot com>, Michael Hudson-Doyle <michael dot hudson at linaro dot org>, GCC Patches <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>, golang-dev <golang-dev at googlegroups dot com>, "gofrontend-dev at googlegroups dot com" <gofrontend-dev at googlegroups dot com>
- Date: Fri, 29 Nov 2013 11:36:15 -0800
- Subject: Re: [patch] introduce aarch64 as a Go architecture
- Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
- References: <52989546 dot 2010702 at ubuntu dot com> <CAKOQZ8ypJn=8SGrutof8aHUJN3=Fj4ymP6vyvLKK8KbDZpF3Eg at mail dot gmail dot com> <5298EC43 dot 6050804 at ubuntu dot com>
On Fri, Nov 29, 2013 at 11:34 AM, Matthias Klose <email@example.com> wrote:
> Please let's pick aarch64. Everybody names it this way, except of course Debian
And the linux kernel.
> :-/ If I understand ARM developers correctly, there will be something like
> aarch32 in the future (x32 for ARM), and I think you don't want to call it arm32.
> Am 29.11.2013 20:22, schrieb Ian Lance Taylor:
>> I've gotten a patch from Michael Hudson-Doyle to set GOARCH to arm64
>> on an Aarch64 system (https://codereview.appspot.com/34830045/). I've
>> gotten a patch from Matthias Klose to set GOARCH to aarch64 on such a
>> system (http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2013-11/msg03765.html).
>> I don't care one way or another myself, but we need to pick one.
>> On Fri, Nov 29, 2013 at 5:23 AM, Matthias Klose <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
>>> This patch introduces aarch64 as a Go architecture.