This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [PATCH] Improve handling of threads which cross over the current loops header

From: Jeff Law <law at redhat dot com>
To: Richard Biener <richard dot guenther at gmail dot com>
Cc: gcc-patches <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>
Date: Wed, 27 Nov 2013 09:32:24 -0700
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Improve handling of threads which cross over the current loops header
Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
References: <528F0C4E dot 5050902 at redhat dot com> <CAFiYyc0FnL0nosr=5ZJKqt4pTVn+B=bC8hw-Q=f+R+1KS5RXiQ at mail dot gmail dot com> <528F7CBF dot 5010109 at redhat dot com> <627de6aa-c058-4443-8399-d1f1cc3c3cbb at email dot android dot com> <52939600 dot 4060802 at redhat dot com> <CAFiYyc0s2ydnSXP0mO6F3MjCHBvao77=HCcbY4fj4KfocER4rA at mail dot gmail dot com> <529522C5 dot 8090507 at redhat dot com> <CAFiYyc2Cwd-7Z+Jn7BYFFN30OU-ApN-qyisT45Pr0o974Zmf4A at mail dot gmail dot com>

On 11/27/13 04:28, Richard Biener wrote:


Ick ;)  Loop fixup isn't able to recover the original loop here, it
discovers a "new" one, the one just covering looping through the
default: case of the switch.

I wouldn't expect it to. I don't have the transformed CFG in front ofme right now, but as you probably saw, it's scrambled pretty badly.

Sadly, we found out yesterday that the submitter of that BZ reducedcoremark too far and the transformation doesn't actually apply tocoremark. We're not going to try and extend things at this point inthe game -- that'll have to be 4.10/5.0 material.


jeff

References:
- [PATCH] Improve handling of threads which cross over the current loops header
  - From: Jeff Law
- Re: [PATCH] Improve handling of threads which cross over the current loops header
  - From: Richard Biener
- Re: [PATCH] Improve handling of threads which cross over the current loops header
  - From: Jeff Law
- Re: [PATCH] Improve handling of threads which cross over the current loops header
  - From: Richard Biener
- Re: [PATCH] Improve handling of threads which cross over the current loops header
  - From: Jeff Law
- Re: [PATCH] Improve handling of threads which cross over the current loops header
  - From: Richard Biener
- Re: [PATCH] Improve handling of threads which cross over the current loops header
  - From: Jeff Law
- Re: [PATCH] Improve handling of threads which cross over the current loops header
  - From: Richard Biener

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]