This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
Hi, On 11/26/2013 08:10 PM, Jason Merrill wrote:
On 11/26/2013 11:43 AM, Paolo Carlini wrote:We have got a bunch of testcases, for example constexpr-ex4.C - attached for your convenience - which trigger the assert !really_overloaded_fn (t) ... What do you suggest?Aha. Well, in that case we really can't get a constant value, so I'd assert allow_non_constant, set *non_constant_p, and return t.Actually, I'd do that any time we get a function COMPONENT_REF, since that will only ever happen under the checking maybe_constant_value call anyway. So a small expansion of your original patch.
Thus something like the below? Passes testing. Thanks, Paolo. ////////////////////////////
Attachment:
patch_58647_3
Description: Text document
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |