This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: wide-int, gimple
- From: Jakub Jelinek <jakub at redhat dot com>
- To: Richard Biener <richard dot guenther at gmail dot com>
- Cc: Mike Stump <mikestump at comcast dot net>, "gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org Patches" <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>, Kenneth Zadeck <zadeck at naturalbridge dot com>
- Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2013 18:18:59 +0100
- Subject: Re: wide-int, gimple
- Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
- References: <6B2EE613-1012-4B93-82A4-B0DEC2639301 at comcast dot net> <CAFiYyc2qrG4hxgF4JO=Pm8PJC6kPHr=rbeVvHLDaKe+ue-UYdQ at mail dot gmail dot com>
- Reply-to: Jakub Jelinek <jakub at redhat dot com>
On Mon, Nov 25, 2013 at 12:24:30PM +0100, Richard Biener wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 23, 2013 at 8:21 PM, Mike Stump <mikestump@comcast.net> wrote:
> > Richi has asked the we break the wide-int patch so that the individual port and front end maintainers can review their parts without have to go through the entire patch. This patch covers the gimple code.
>
> @@ -1754,7 +1754,7 @@ dump_ssaname_info (pretty_printer *buffer, tree
> node, int spc)
> if (!POINTER_TYPE_P (TREE_TYPE (node))
> && SSA_NAME_RANGE_INFO (node))
> {
> - double_int min, max, nonzero_bits;
> + widest_int min, max, nonzero_bits;
> value_range_type range_type = get_range_info (node, &min, &max);
>
> if (range_type == VR_VARYING)
>
> this makes me suspect you are changing SSA_NAME_RANGE_INFO
> to embed two max wide_ints. That's a no-no.
Well, the range_info_def struct right now contains 3 double_ints, which is
unnecessary overhead for the most of the cases where the SSA_NAME's type
has just at most HOST_BITS_PER_WIDE_INT bits and thus we could fit all 3 of
them into 3 HOST_WIDE_INTs rather than 3 double_ints. So supposedly struct
range_info_def could be a template on the type's precision rounded up to HWI
bits, or say have 3 alternatives there, use
FIXED_WIDE_INT (HOST_BITS_PER_WIDE_INT) for the smallest types,
FIXED_WIDE_INT (2 * HOST_BITS_PER_WIDE_INT) aka double_int for the larger
but still common ones, and widest_int for the rest, then the API to set/get
it could use widest_int everywhere, and just what storage we'd use would
depend on the precision of the type.
Jakub