This is the mail archive of the mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [patch][RFC] make lra.c:check_rtl set maybe_hot_insn_p

On 18/11/13 08:37, Yvan Roux wrote:
So, the validation is ok with this patch, I'm just not able to say if
the original performance issue is still fixed with it.  Could you
check it Kyrylo ?

Hi Yvan,
I'll run the benchmark today to confirm the performance, but from compiling some code sequences that exhibited the bad behaviour in the past, I see that this patch still fixes the issues. store_minmaxsi is not generated when optimising for speed.



2013-11-17  Yvan Roux  <>

         * config/arm/ (store_minmaxsi): Use only when

On 15 November 2013 15:59, Yvan Roux <> wrote:
Sometimes 4 will be needed, since both original register values may
remain live.

However, I'm inclined to agree that while it should be possible to
decide at the *function* level whether or not an insn is valid, doing so
at the block level is probably unsafe.
Ok, so the attached patch should fix the issue, its validation is ongoing.

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]