This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
On 3 November 2013 11:30, Paolo Carlini wrote: > On 11/03/2013 12:19 PM, Jonathan Wakely wrote: >> >> Yes, Paolo pointed out these are failing on 32-bit targets, I've got a >> patch coming. Luc is there any reason not to just replace all those large >> constants with 0x1234ABCD, which fits in a long on 32-bit targets? > > By the way, that's what I did/hacked in my local tree ;) I needed some other changes, otherwise comparing optional<long>{} == 0x1234ABCD doesn't compile, because 0x1234ABCD is an int and optional<T> doesn't support comparisons with anything except T. > Jon, I have got a bunch of other minor tweaks, from proper formatting of > conditional operator and some curly braces, to using __and_ and __not_ when > possible, and other thingies, like no full stops at the end of asserts and > throws. Passes testing. You may want to integrate it with your other changes > in testing... Or I can wait and apply it myself. Here's the combined patch, tested x86_64-linux, 64-bit and 32-bit, committed to trunk. 2013-11-05 Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@gmail.com> Paolo Carlini <paolo.carlini@oracle.com> * include/experimental/optional: Use __and_<> and __not_<> in conditions. Style fixes. (__constexpr_addressof, swap): Make inline. * testsuite/experimental/optional/cons/copy.cc: Adjust constants for 32-bit targets. * testsuite/experimental/optional/cons/move.cc: Likewise. * testsuite/experimental/optional/cons/value.cc: Likewise. * testsuite/experimental/optional/constexpr/cons/value.cc: Likewise.
Attachment:
patch.txt
Description: Text document
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |