This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [wide-int] Make trees more like rtxes


On Wed, 23 Oct 2013, Richard Sandiford wrote:

> Mike Stump <mikestump@comcast.net> writes:
> > On Oct 23, 2013, at 5:00 AM, Richard Sandiford
> > <rsandifo@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> >> offset_int, max_int, wi::to_offset and wi::to_max sound OK to me.
> >> Kenny?  Mike?
> >
> > Those two names seem reasonable.  to_offset should document that these
> > are for address offsets (and address constants) exclusively.
> 
> Reading this back, I realise "max_int" might sound too similar to INT_MAX.
> Maybe we could follow the current HOST_* stuff and use: offset_int, widest_int,
> wi::to_offset and wi::to_widest.
> 
> Bah.  I'm no good at naming stuff...

Nobody is ... but yes, offset_int and widest_int and wi::to_offset
and wi::to_widest sounds good to me - both short and descriptive.

Richard.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]