This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
Let me try that again. Sorry for the dupe and the bad subject in the previous message. This patch fixes a small stylistic nit in the user-defined literal operators in the standard library.I propose we prefer: operator""suf - with no spacerather than: operator"" suf - with spaceIt is only strictly necessary to have no space between quotes and suffix identifier when the suffix identifier is a keyword. On the other hand, consistently using no space means never having to say you're sorry. It is also consistent with our style of not having space between operator and, say '+'. I believe that first allowing the space in the first place might have been a mistake in the standard. The (to be committed tonight) literal operators for complex<float> need to have no space because the suffix is 'if'. We might as well be consistent. I think this is better style too.Ed
Attachment:
CL_lit_oper_style
Description: Binary data
Attachment:
patch_lit_oper_style
Description: Binary data
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |