This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [wide-int] int_traits <tree>
- From: "Bernhard Reutner-Fischer" <rep dot dot dot nop at gmail dot com>
- To: Jakub Jelinek <jakub at redhat dot com>, Mike Stump <mikestump at comcast dot net>
- Cc: Kenneth Zadeck <zadeck at naturalbridge dot com>, Richard Biener <rguenther at suse dot de>, Richard Sandiford <rdsandiford at googlemail dot com>, <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- Date: Sat, 19 Oct 2013 14:20:27 +0200
- Subject: Re: [wide-int] int_traits <tree>
- Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
- References: <alpine dot LNX dot 2 dot 00 dot 1310161537220 dot 11149 at zhemvz dot fhfr dot qr> <525EB50F dot 2090003 at naturalbridge dot com> <87ppr56on1 dot fsf at talisman dot default> <525EFC33 dot 4010304 at naturalbridge dot com> <87hacg720z dot fsf at talisman dot default> <alpine dot LNX dot 2 dot 00 dot 1310171015000 dot 11149 at zhemvz dot fhfr dot qr> <30C4C2A0-38C8-4F3B-80B2-7AEFFB99AD0D at comcast dot net> <alpine dot LNX dot 2 dot 00 dot 1310181037170 dot 11149 at zhemvz dot fhfr dot qr> <52613396 dot 3030605 at naturalbridge dot com> <DBA11B41-3B27-4AAF-BEA4-E5D17276E5D5 at comcast dot net> <20131018205538 dot GX30970 at tucnak dot zalov dot cz>
On 18 October 2013 22:55:39 Jakub Jelinek <email@example.com> wrote:
On Fri, Oct 18, 2013 at 01:52:54PM -0700, Mike Stump wrote:
> On Oct 18, 2013, at 6:11 AM, Kenneth Zadeck <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> >>> Does this look ok? Kenny, can you double check the cases, think I
have them right, but? a double check would be good.
> >> That works for me.
> >> > i talked to mike about this last night, but did not follow up with
an email until now. The problem is that this code is wrong!!! He is
working to fix that and so i would expect something from him later
(tomorrow for those in europe).
> Ok, updated the patch, here is what I checked in:
> diff --git a/gcc/wide-int.h b/gcc/wide-int.h
> index 2ff130b..738ae11 100644
> --- a/gcc/wide-int.h
> +++ b/gcc/wide-int.h
> @@ -185,7 +185,9 @@ along with GCC; see the file COPYING3. If not see
> assuming t is a int_cst.
> - Note that the bits above the precision are not defined and the
> + Note, the bits past the precision up to the nearest HOST_WDE_INT
falls into the same category, without commenting on the patch itself.
Sent with AquaMail for Android