This is the mail archive of the mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [C11-atomic] Miscellaneous fixes 1/n

On 10/17/2013 05:50 PM, Joseph S. Myers wrote:
I've applied this patch to the C11-atomic branch to fix various
miscellaneous issues.


I put a hack in the C++ front end to disable checks on atomic
qualifiers so that libstdc++ builds - I think that if you want other
people to help on a development branch, it should be kept in a state
where it builds and tests cleanly.  However, I'm aiming specifically
Yes, perhaps I should not have checked in the bit that uses the atomic attribute in the c++ templates... it was working fine until late in the game when I removed the incorrect "treat atomic as volatile" parts of the patches.. which then caused that failure. sorry. I didn't know how to fix it "correctly"... I figured it should be easy if you knew how :-P but maybe not...

to sort out the C front-end (and later stdatomic.h) issues, with a
view to getting the actual C11 support in shape and with adequate
testsuite coverage, so if that's ready on time I may propose it for
mainline without the attribute or C++ changes - as I understand it,
those are only needed for when targets start defining atomic types as
larger or more-aligned than the corresponding non-atomic types, not to
support the C11 features on the most common architectures.

right. We may re-visit it when we finalize the ABI changes for c++... Use of the attribute in c++ will ensure that C and C++ both treat an atomic object the same... My original discussions with lawrence and jeffrey over atomics concerned the desire to "upsize" an _Atomic object to the next highest size that supports lock-free operations. (ie, a 6 byte object becomes an 8 byte atomic object). The __attribute__ is really to ensure we can share the code and get compatible behaviour between languages. At the moment it is a nop. A better solution may show up, if we ever actually need it.

Thanks for picking this up... I for one really appreciate it.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]