This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: Copyright years for new old ports (Re: Ping^6: contribute Synopsys Designware ARC port)
- From: Joern Rennecke <joern dot rennecke at embecosm dot com>
- To: Jakub Jelinek <jakub at redhat dot com>
- Cc: Jeff Law <law at redhat dot com>, Diego Novillo <dnovillo at google dot com>, gcc-patches <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>, Richard Earnshaw <richard dot earnshaw at arm dot com>, Richard Biener <rguenther at suse dot de>, Richard Henderson <rth at redhat dot com>, Geoffrey Keating <geoffk at geoffk dot org>, Richard Kenner <kenner at nyu dot edu>, Michael Meissner <gnu at the-meissners dot org>, Jason Merrill <jason at redhat dot com>, "David S. Miller" <davem at redhat dot com>, Mark Mitchell <mark at codesourcery dot com>, Joseph Myers <joseph at codesourcery dot com>, Bernd Schmidt <bernds at codesourcery dot com>, Ian Lance Taylor <ian at airs dot com>, Jim Wilson <wilson at tuliptree dot org>
- Date: Wed, 02 Oct 2013 06:23:04 -0400
- Subject: Re: Copyright years for new old ports (Re: Ping^6: contribute Synopsys Designware ARC port)
- Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
- References: <20130928095442 dot dpsqk8x5440k4ko0-nzlynne at webmail dot spamcop dot net> <CAD_=9DR6pD7DdmO5b6U5tip92Xx6zkcgkjE77+8Vr7C8uNayHQ at mail dot gmail dot com> <20131001172613 dot 53fb0h5s84g8wkcc-nzlynne at webmail dot spamcop dot net> <524B4B2E dot 5090808 at redhat dot com> <20131002062024 dot GI30970 at tucnak dot zalov dot cz> <20131002060514 dot 5zm671kjj4k0kgs8-nzlynne at webmail dot spamcop dot net> <20131002100920 dot GO30970 at tucnak dot zalov dot cz>
Quoting Jakub Jelinek <email@example.com>:
On Wed, Oct 02, 2013 at 06:05:14AM -0400, Joern Rennecke wrote:
From my understanding, the condition for adding the current Copyright year
without a source code change is to have a release in that year. Are we
sure 4.9.0 will be released this year?
We are sure we don't want 4.9.0 to be released this year ;)
>Because GCC has switched to Copyright year ranges, in fact all the
>lines should be either 2013, or firstyear-2013.
The way I recall the argument is that the releases we make allow us to add
a copyright year without a source code change, and because files on trunk
are included in a release at least once a year, you can fill in a range for
their stay within trunk. However, this port hasn't been in the FSF
till now, so what we have at this moment are the lists of years
when the code
But, all the other files in gcc/ are now someyear-2013, new files added
are also 2013, if you make your files someyear-2011 or similar, then I think
the scripts won't easily adjust it to someyear-2014 when we run the script
early in January 2014.
So, should I add 2014 now? That would be no more speculative than adding
the current year at the start of the year in anticipation of a release that
year. Or put something in my Calendar to do it in 2014?
Or should I backport the port into the gcc 4.8 branch, so assuming we still
make another 4.8.x release this year, there is justification to add the 2013