This is the mail archive of the mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

[ping**(n+1)] reimplement -fstrict-volatile-bitfields, v3


On 09/02/2013 12:56 PM, Sandra Loosemore wrote:
On 09/02/2013 03:10 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
Can someone, in a new thread, ping the patches that are still in
flight?  ISTR having approved bits of some patches before my leave.

Here's the current state of the patch set I put together.  I've lost
track of where the canonical version of Bernd's followup patch is.

On 07/09/2013 10:23 AM, Sandra Loosemore wrote:
On 06/30/2013 09:24 PM, Sandra Loosemore wrote:
Here is my third attempt at cleaning up -fstrict-volatile-bitfields.

Part 1 removes the warnings and packedp flag.  It is the same as in the
last version, and has already been approved.  I'll skip reposting it
since the patch is here already:

Part 2 replaces parts 2, 3, and 4 in the last version.  I've re-worked
this code significantly to try to address Bernd Edlinger's comments on
the last version in PR56997.

Part 2:

Part 3 is the test cases, which are the same as in the last version.
Nobody has reviewed these but I assume they are OK if Part 2 is

Part 4 is new; it makes -fstrict-volatile-bitfields not be the default
for any target any more.  It is independent of the other changes.

Part 4:



Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]