This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: wide-int branch now up for public comment and review
- From: Mike Stump <mikestump at comcast dot net>
- To: Richard Sandiford <rdsandiford at googlemail dot com>
- Cc: Kenneth Zadeck <zadeck at naturalbridge dot com>, rguenther at suse dot de, gcc-patches <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>, r dot sandiford at uk dot ibm dot com
- Date: Sun, 25 Aug 2013 10:39:15 -0700
- Subject: Re: wide-int branch now up for public comment and review
- References: <520A9DCC dot 6080609 at naturalbridge dot com> <87ppt4e9hg dot fsf at talisman dot default>
On Aug 23, 2013, at 8:02 AM, Richard Sandiford <email@example.com> wrote:
> We really need to get rid of the #include "tm.h" in wide-int.h.
> MAX_BITSIZE_MODE_ANY_INT should be the only partially-target-dependent
> thing in there. If that comes from tm.h then perhaps we should put it
> into a new header file instead.
BITS_PER_UNIT comes from there as well, and I'd need both. Grabbing the #defines we generate is easy enough, but BITS_PER_UNIT would be more annoying. No port in the tree makes use of it yet (other than 8). So, do we just assume BITS_PER_UNIT is 8?