This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: wide-int branch now up for public comment and review
- From: Kenneth Zadeck <zadeck at naturalbridge dot com>
- To: Florian Weimer <fweimer at redhat dot com>
- Cc: gcc-patches <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- Date: Sat, 24 Aug 2013 14:42:24 -0400
- Subject: Re: wide-int branch now up for public comment and review
- References: <520A9DCC dot 6080609 at naturalbridge dot com> <5218F882 dot 8060704 at redhat dot com>
On 08/24/2013 02:16 PM, Florian Weimer wrote:
It depends, there is nothing wrong with lossy conversions as long as you
know what you are doing.
On 08/13/2013 10:57 PM, Kenneth Zadeck wrote:
1) The 4 files that hold the wide-int code itself. You have seen a
lot of this code before except for the infinite precision
templates. Also the classes are more C++ than C in their flavor.
In particular, the integration with trees is very tight in that an
int-cst or regular integers can be the operands of any wide-int
Are any of these conversions lossy? Maybe some of these constructors
should be made explicit?