This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: wide-int branch now up for public comment and review

From: Kenneth Zadeck <zadeck at naturalbridge dot com>
To: Florian Weimer <fweimer at redhat dot com>
Cc: gcc-patches <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>
Date: Sat, 24 Aug 2013 14:42:24 -0400
Subject: Re: wide-int branch now up for public comment and review
References: <520A9DCC dot 6080609 at naturalbridge dot com> <5218F882 dot 8060704 at redhat dot com>

On 08/24/2013 02:16 PM, Florian Weimer wrote:

On 08/13/2013 10:57 PM, Kenneth Zadeck wrote:

1) The 4 files that hold the wide-int code itself.  You have seen a
    lot of this code before except for the infinite precision
    templates.  Also the classes are more C++ than C in their flavor.
    In particular, the integration with trees is very tight in that an
    int-cst or regular integers can be the operands of any wide-int
    operation.

Are any of these conversions lossy? Maybe some of these constructorsshould be made explicit?

It depends, there is nothing wrong with lossy conversions as long as youknow what you are doing.

References:
- wide-int branch now up for public comment and review
  - From: Kenneth Zadeck
- Re: wide-int branch now up for public comment and review
  - From: Florian Weimer

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]