This is the mail archive of the mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: RFA: Fix declaration of default value of TARGET_NARROW_VOLATILE_BITFIELD

Hi Nick,

it looks this patch did not get applied.  Is this because you
failed to get approval?

With a patch Joseph did recently, this would now be in gcc/target.def,
and from what I can see both parts of the patch are fine.

Unless anyone objects, can you please ago ahead and commit an
update patch?


On Wed, 24 Apr 2013, Nick Clifton wrote:
>   The TARGET_NARROW_VOLATILE_BITFIELD target macro defaults to false:
>     (narrow_volatile_bitfield,
>      "",
>      bool, (void),
>      hook_bool_void_false)
>   but the documentation currently states that it defaults to
>   !TARGET_STRICT_ALIGN.  The patch below corrects this, and also fixes a
>   small typo in the description of TARGET_CANONICALIZE_COMPARISON.
>   Ok to apply ?
> Cheers
>   Nick
> gcc/ChangeLog
> 2013-04-24  Nick Clifton  <>
> 	default to false.
> 	* doc/tm.texi: Regenerate.
> Index: gcc/doc/
> ===================================================================
> --- gcc/doc/	(revision 198216)
> +++ gcc/doc/	(working copy)
> @@ -1236,7 +1236,7 @@
>  should use the narrowest mode possible.  It should return @code{false} if
>  these accesses should use the bitfield container type.
> -The default is @code{!TARGET_STRICT_ALIGN}.
> +The default is @code{false}.
>  @end deftypefn
> @@ -5947,7 +5947,7 @@
>  valid but will see if the resulting insn matches a pattern in the
>  @file{md} file.
> -You need not to implement this hook if it would never change the
> +You need not implement this hook if it would never change the
>  comparison code or operands.
>  @end deftypefn

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]