This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

[PING]RE: [PATCH] Fix for PR c/57490


Has anyone had a chance to look at this patch? Is it OK for trunk?

Thanks,

-Balaji V. Iyer.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Iyer, Balaji V
> Sent: Monday, August 12, 2013 1:17 PM
> To: Rainer Orth
> Cc: Jakub Jelinek; gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org; Marek Polacek
> (polacek@redhat.com)
> Subject: RE: [PATCH] Fix for PR c/57490
> 
> 
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Rainer Orth [mailto:ro@CeBiTec.Uni-Bielefeld.DE]
> > Sent: Friday, August 09, 2013 7:54 AM
> > To: Iyer, Balaji V
> > Cc: Jakub Jelinek; gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org; Marek Polacek
> > (polacek@redhat.com)
> > Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix for PR c/57490
> >
> > Rainer Orth <ro@CeBiTec.Uni-Bielefeld.DE> writes:
> >
> > > Rainer Orth <ro@CeBiTec.Uni-Bielefeld.DE> writes:
> > >
> > >> "Iyer, Balaji V" <balaji.v.iyer@intel.com> writes:
> > >>
> > >>>> -----Original Message-----
> > >>>> From: Jakub Jelinek [mailto:jakub@redhat.com]
> > >>>> Sent: Monday, July 01, 2013 1:09 PM
> > >>>> To: Iyer, Balaji V
> > >>>> Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org; Rainer Orth
> > >>>> Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix for PR c/57490
> > >>>>
> > >>>> On Mon, Jul 01, 2013 at 05:02:57PM +0000, Iyer, Balaji V wrote:
> > >>>> > OK. The fixed patch is attached. Here are the ChangeLog entries:
> > >>>> >
> > >>>> > gcc/cp/ChangeLog
> > >>>> > 2013-07-01  Balaji V. Iyer  <balaji.v.iyer@intel.com>
> > >>>> >
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Still
> > >>>> 	PR c/57490
> > >>>> hasn't been added to cp/ChangeLog and c/ChangeLog entries.
> > >>>> > --- /dev/null
> > >>>> > +++ b/gcc/testsuite/c-c++-common/cilk-plus/AN/pr57490.c
> > >>>> > @@ -0,0 +1,25 @@
> > >>>>
> > >>>
> > >>> Fixed as you suggested. Here is the fixed Changelogs and patch is
> attached.
> > >>>
> > >>> gcc/cp/ChangeLog
> > >>> 2013-07-01  Balaji V. Iyer  <balaji.v.iyer@intel.com>
> > >>>
> > >>>         PR c/57490
> > >>>         * cp-array-notation.c (cp_expand_cond_array_notations): Added a
> > >>>         check for truth values.
> > >>>         (expand_array_notation_exprs): Added truth values case.  Removed
> an
> > >>>         unwanted else.  Added for-loop to walk through subtrees in default
> > >>>         case.
> > >>>
> > >>> gcc/c/ChangeLog
> > >>> 2013-07-01  Balaji V. Iyer  <balaji.v.iyer@intel.com>
> > >>>
> > >>>         PR c/57490
> > >>>         * c-array-notation.c (fix_conditional_array_notations_1): Added a
> > >>>         check for truth values.
> > >>>         (expand_array_notation_exprs): Added truth values case.  Removed
> an
> > >>>         unwanted else.  Added for-loop to walk through subtrees in default
> > >>>         case.
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>> gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
> > >>> 2013-07-01  Balaji V. Iyer  <balaji.v.iyer@intel.com>
> > >>>
> > >>>         PR c/57490
> > >>>         * c-c++-common/cilk-plus/AN/pr57490.c: New test.
> > >>
> > >> I've just tested this patch on i386-pc-solaris2.10:
> > >>
> > >> The c-c++-common/cilk-plus/AN/an-if.c test still FAILs for C++:
> > >>
> > >> FAIL: c-c++-common/cilk-plus/AN/an-if.c  -fcilkplus (internal
> > >> compiler error)
> > >> FAIL: c-c++-common/cilk-plus/AN/an-if.c  -fcilkplus (test for
> > >> excess
> > >> errors)
> > [...]
> > > This is still unfixed almost three weeks later.  Balaji, could you
> > > please have a look?
> >
> > This bug is now unfixed for two months, and no reaction whatsoever on
> > the report.  This is getting annoying since it generates large amount
> > of testsuite noise.
> >
> > Please fix ASAP!
> >
> 
> Hi Rainer,
> 
>    First off, my sincerest apologies for letting this bug slip the cracks. I am
> attaching a patch that seem to work fine with the .i file that you have submitted
> in bugzilla for both C and C++. Please let me know if this fix works for you and if
> it is OK for trunk.
> 
> Here are the Changelog entries:
> gcc/c/ChangeLog
> 2013-08-12  Balaji V. Iyer  <balaji.v.iyer@intel.com>
> 
>         PR c/57490
>         * c-array-notation.c (fix_conditional_array_notations_1): Added a
>         check for truth values.
>         (expand_array_notation_exprs): Added truth values case.  Removed an
>         unwanted else.  Added for-loop to walk through subtrees in default
>         case.
> 
> gcc/cp/ChangeLog
> 2013-08-12  Balaji V. Iyer  <balaji.v.iyer@intel.com>
> 
>         PR c/57490
>         * cp-array-notation.c (cp_expand_cond_array_notations): Added a
>         check for truth values.
>         (expand_array_notation_exprs): Added truth values case.  Removed an
>         unwanted else.  Added for-loop to walk through subtrees in default
>         case.
>         * typeck.c (cp_build_binary_op): Inherited the type of the array
>         notation for built-in array notation functions.
> 
> gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
> 2013-07-01  Balaji V. Iyer  <balaji.v.iyer@intel.com>
> 
>         PR c/57490
>         * c-c++-common/cilk-plus/AN/pr57490.c: New test.
> 
> 
> Yours sincerely,
> 
> Balaji V. Iyer.
> 
> 
> > 	Rainer
> >
> > --
> > ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> > ------- Rainer Orth, Center for Biotechnology, Bielefeld University


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]