This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: testsuite patches (12/14): Add predicates to tests that depend on integer size


On Jul 19, 2013, at 11:46 PM, Joern Rennecke <joern.rennecke@embecosm.com> wrote:
> Tested for avr with --target_board=atmega128-sim and native on i686-pc-linuc-gnu.
> 
> 2013-07-17  Joern Rennecke <joern.rennecke@embecosm.com>
> 
> 	* c-c++-common/simulate-thread/bitfields-2.c: Run test only for
> 	target { ! int16 }.
> 	* gcc.dg/tree-ssa/pr54245.c: Do slsr scan only for target { ! int16 }.
> 	* gcc.dg/tree-ssa/slsr-1.c: Adjust multiplicators to scan for for
> 	target { int16 }.  Restrict existing tests to target { int32 }
> 	where appropriate.
> 	* gcc.dg/tree-ssa/slsr-2.c, gcc.dg/tree-ssa/slsr-27.c: Likewise.
> 	* gcc.dg/tree-ssa/slsr-28.c, gcc.dg/tree-ssa/slsr-29.c: Likewise.
> 	* gcc.dg/tree-ssa/slsr-3.c, gcc.dg/tree-ssa/ssa-ccp-23.c: Likewise.
> 	* lib/target-supports.exp (check_effective_target_int32): New proc.

Ok.

I'd recommend an Ok? in patches that seek approval or explicit review.  Sometimes people post patches that are trivial and just check them in.

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]