This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

RE: [PATCH][4.8 backport] Fix PR57735


> > Ping?
> >
> 
> Ping^2
> 

Ping^3
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2013-07/msg00929.html

>  Thanks,
>  Kyrill
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org [mailto:gcc-patches-
> > > owner@gcc.gnu.org] On Behalf Of Kyrylo Tkachov
> > > Sent: 23 July 2013 10:09
> > > To: 'Richard Sandiford'
> > > Cc: gcc-patches; mikpe@it.uu.se; 'Richard Biener'
> > > Subject: RE: [PATCH][4.8 backport] Fix PR57735
> > >
> > > Hi Richard,
> > >
> > > > Richard Sandiford <rdsandiford@googlemail.com> writes:
> > > > > "Kyrylo Tkachov" <kyrylo.tkachov@arm.com> writes:
> > > > >> Hi all,
> > > > >>
> > > > >> The fix for PR57735 is in current trunk (for a different issue I
> > > > think), just
> > > > >> needs a backport to 4.8.
> > > > >> It is r198462 by Richard Sandiford:
> > > > >>
> > > > >> 2013-04-30 Richard Sandiford <rsandifo@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> > > > >>
> > > > >>  	* explow.c (plus_constant): Pass "mode" to
> > > immed_double_int_const.
> > > > >>  	Use gen_int_mode rather than GEN_INT.
> > > > >>
> > > > >> Ok to backport to the 4.8 branch?
> > > > >
> > > > > Sorry for dropping the ball.  It's already been approved for 4.8,
> > > > > and I think I even remembered to test it ready for commit.  I
> just
> > > > > never actually hit commit afterwards :-(
> > > >
> > > > *sigh*.  Scratch that.  I'd confused it with:
> > > >
> > > > 2013-05-22  Richard Sandiford  <rsandifo@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> > > >
> > > > 	* recog.c (offsettable_address_addr_space_p): Fix calculation
> of
> > > > 	address mode.  Move pointer mode initialization to the same
> place.
> > > >
> > > > which I _did_ apply to 4.8.  Sorry about the confusion instead...
> > >
> > > It's ok, didn't have time to act on the confusion anyway :)
> > >
> > > So is the proposed one ok to backport? I've bootstrapped it on
> > > arm-none-linux-gnueabihf and tested on arm-none-eabi with qemu.
> > >
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Kyrill
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> >





Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]