Re: [C++ PATCH] Grammar fix in pt.c comments.

[Dodji Seketeli <dodji at seketeli dot org>]

Thank you for this patch, Adam.

Adam Butcher <adam@jessamine.co.uk> a Ãcrit:

> 	* pt.c: Grammar fix in comments ("it's" to "its").

FWIW, this change seems to fall under the obvious rule and thus, ought
to be committed.

>
> ---
>  gcc/cp/pt.c | 6 +++---
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/gcc/cp/pt.c b/gcc/cp/pt.c
> index ce899ef..78b7a97 100644
> --- a/gcc/cp/pt.c
> +++ b/gcc/cp/pt.c
> @@ -1986,7 +1986,7 @@ determine_specialization (tree template_id,
>  	  tree decl_arg_types;
>  
>  	  /* This is an ordinary member function.  However, since
> -	     we're here, we can assume it's enclosing class is a
> +	     we're here, we can assume its enclosing class is a
>  	     template class.  For example,
>  
>  	       template <typename T> struct S { void f(); };
> @@ -4337,7 +4337,7 @@ check_default_tmpl_args (tree decl, tree parms, bool is_primary,
>  	  || DECL_INITIALIZED_IN_CLASS_P (decl)))
>      /* We already checked these parameters when the template was
>         declared, so there's no need to do it again now.  This function
> -       was defined in class scope, but we're processing it's body now
> +       was defined in class scope, but we're processing its body now
>         that the class is complete.  */
>      return true;
>  
> @@ -7555,7 +7555,7 @@ lookup_template_class_1 (tree d1, tree arglist, tree in_decl, tree context,
>  	the one of #0.
>  
>  	When we encounter #1, we want to store the partial instantiation
> -	of M (template<class T> S<int>::M<T>) in it's CLASSTYPE_TI_TEMPLATE.
> +	of M (template<class T> S<int>::M<T>) in its CLASSTYPE_TI_TEMPLATE.
>  
>  	For all cases other than this "explicit specialization of member of a
>  	class template", we just want to store the most general template into

-- 
		Dodji