This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [C++ Patch / RFC] PR 46206
- From: Paolo Carlini <paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com>
- To: David Edelsohn <dje dot gcc at gmail dot com>
- Cc: Iain Sandoe <iain at codesourcery dot com>, Dominique Dhumieres <dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr>, GCC Patches <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>, Jason Merrill <jason at redhat dot com>
- Date: Fri, 09 Aug 2013 17:47:04 +0200
- Subject: Re: [C++ Patch / RFC] PR 46206
- References: <20130809105250 dot 85B7D3BE1E at mailhost dot lps dot ens dot fr> <5204CEB1 dot 8010605 at oracle dot com> <2443FCF9-FC46-4D74-91B2-CF1FAE69CD8B at codesourcery dot com> <CAGWvnyk1GevoCi5DDQzoxJB7L=DsfaBZnDPZKUzCyHcwhV2oJA at mail dot gmail dot com>
On 08/09/2013 05:22 PM, David Edelsohn wrote:
Exactly. What is the common factor on AIX, Darwin and Solaris that is
different from Linux? A difference in system types? How can we help?
Thanks David, all, for your kind offers.
As I said the issue is weird, I think the only way in practice to make
progress is very serious debugging on AIX and either Darwin or Solaris.
Note that AIX and Darwin are already different: on the latter only the
second new subtest fails, that for Foo2, on AIX both.
For the time being I decided to revert the patch, otherwise the issue
only makes me nervous. If somebody has insights, basing on my original
analysis here maybe:
I would be glad to work again on the issue at a later time, in say a
week or two. At the moment my TODO list is already full.