This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
Hi, On 08/09/2013 07:08 AM, Tim Shen wrote:
Yes, if, as it should, it works on -m32 too, let's go with this. By the way, you didn't say how exactly you are testing?!? Because just make check doesn't test -m32. I use, something like:On Fri, Aug 9, 2013 at 12:51 AM, Tim Shen <timshen91@gmail.com> wrote:So here's the change. It's under testing now, but could took several hours. If someone has a faster machine, please tell the result :)Unfortuantely using `unsigned int => unsigned short` cannot work. Instead, I create a enum and do some operator overloadings. This patch passed bootstrap and all tests under the configuration under x86_64: --with-arch=corei7 --with-cpu=corei7 --prefix=/usr/local --enable-clocale=gnu --with-system-zlib --enable-shared --with-demangler-in-ld --with-fpmath=sse --enable-languages=c++
make -k check-target-libstdc++-v3 RUNTESTFLAGS="--target_board='unix/\{-m32,-m64\}'"
for sure there are other ways to obtain the same result. Paolo.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |