This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [PATCH, PowerPC] altivec_expand_vec_perm_const reverses pack pattern arguments in little endian mode



On Mon, 2013-07-22 at 19:49 -0400, David Edelsohn wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 7:05 PM, Bill Schmidt
> <wschmidt@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> > This patch is another fix for vector handling in little endian mode.
> > The first two operands for a pack pattern are two vector registers that
> > form a contiguous array of inputs.  In LE mode the order of the operands
> > must be reversed so that the array remains contiguous in the reverse
> > order.
> >
> > This fixes a failure in the testsuite when run little-endian
> > (gcc.dg/vect/no-scevccp-outer-18.c).  Bootstrapped and tested big-endian
> > on powerpc64-unknown-linux-gnu with no new regressions.  Ok for trunk?
> >
> > Patch by Anton Blanchard.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Bill
> >
> >
> > 2013-07-22  Bill Schmidt  <wschmidt@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> >             Anton Blanchard <anton@au1.ibm.com>
> >
> >         * config/rs6000/rs6000.c (altivec_expand_vec_perm_const): Reverse
> >         two operands for little-endian.
> 
> Wouldn't it be better to handle this where the code is performing a
> swap a few lines above?

Hm, I don't think so.  The reason for that swap has nothing to do with
endianness, so I think it would just confuse matters.  Also there's a
three-way swap going on with x, op0, and op1 there, and we just want to
swap op0 and op1.  I think the patch as it stands is probably easier to
grok.

Thanks,
Bill
> 
> Thanks, David
> 


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]