This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [PATCH] S/390: Hardware transactional memory support
- From: Peter Bergner <bergner at vnet dot ibm dot com>
- To: David Edelsohn <dje dot gcc at gmail dot com>
- Cc: Jakub Jelinek <jakub at redhat dot com>, Andreas Krebbel <krebbel at linux dot vnet dot ibm dot com>, GCC Patches <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- Date: Tue, 16 Jul 2013 11:37:14 -0500
- Subject: Re: [PATCH] S/390: Hardware transactional memory support
- References: <20130621102314 dot GA753 at bart> <20130715193231 dot GR2475 at laptop dot redhat dot com> <1373919992 dot 4538 dot 177 dot camel at otta> <CAGWvny=6AdC-SHjj-h+zcdJFsOVXY8ORFchvbtuiViMRJXZA7Q at mail dot gmail dot com> <1373946004 dot 4538 dot 183 dot camel at otta> <20130716052431 dot GA23578 at laptop dot redhat dot com> <CAGWvnym5G85PemnLpt-idyXk3Vd7-F9J1dLSgwFs9D22XssAyA at mail dot gmail dot com> <1373986180 dot 4538 dot 185 dot camel at otta>
On Tue, 2013-07-16 at 09:49 -0500, Peter Bergner wrote:
> On Tue, 2013-07-16 at 08:08 -0400, David Edelsohn wrote:
> > Then I agree that the hunk should be reverted so that HTM does not imply POWER8.
>
> Ok, I'll bootstrap and regtest just to be sure there is no unintended
> fallout for such a small path before committing. Thanks.
Ok, committed as revision 200985. Thanks.
Peter