This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: List of typos.
- From: OndÅej BÃlka <neleai at seznam dot cz>
- To: Georg-Johann Lay <gjl at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- Cc: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely dot gcc at gmail dot com>, gcc-patches <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>, "gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org>, Veres Lajos <vlajos at gmail dot com>
- Date: Mon, 8 Jul 2013 15:44:56 +0200
- Subject: Re: List of typos.
- References: <alpine dot DEB dot 2 dot 00 dot 1307031107230 dot 8850 at citymarket dot hu> <alpine dot DEB dot 2 dot 00 dot 1307040438220 dot 8850 at citymarket dot hu> <alpine dot DEB dot 2 dot 10 dot 1307040903350 dot 25651 at stedding dot saclay dot inria dot fr> <CAH6eHdT4OJ6J-wPAbXQn6RzKUcTBC9H8TqmDXtdQT_efn3FAtA at mail dot gmail dot com> <20130705154318 dot GA26780 at domone dot kolej dot mff dot cuni dot cz> <CAH6eHdTb_KBzAhf1Wnbhrdj2T4+TEuoMd5__AkPKGj_X8v9hmQ at mail dot gmail dot com> <20130706054417 dot GA1849 at domone dot kolej dot mff dot cuni dot cz> <CAH6eHdTL6vfYC9z4kMpcVJO+u9hBtTHnwshU+zULaFYqxdW07Q at mail dot gmail dot com> <20130707142115 dot GA5209 at domone dot kolej dot mff dot cuni dot cz> <51D9AB5A dot 8000303 at gcc dot gnu dot org>
On Sun, Jul 07, 2013 at 07:54:34PM +0200, Georg-Johann Lay wrote:
> Ondrej Bilka schrieb:
>
> >http://kam.mff.cuni.cz/~ondra/gcc_misspell.patch
>
> This is wrong:
>
> @@ -10834,7 +10834,7 @@ avr_convert_to_type (tree type, tree expr)
> XOP[2] # Bytes to copy
>
> Return TRUE if the expansion is accomplished.
> - Return FALSE if the operand compination is not supported. */
> + Return FALSE if the operand compilation is not supported. */
>
> Should be "combination" not "compilation".
>
>
> index 406617f..c7a7f7b 100644
> --- a/gcc/config/frv/frv-opts.h
> +++ b/gcc/config/frv/frv-opts.h
> @@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
> -/* Frv option-handling defitions.
> +/* Frv option-handling deviations.
>
> Should be "definitions" instead of "deviations".
>
>
> -/* Expand SYMBOL into its corresponding far-addresse symbol.
> +/* Expand SYMBOL into its corresponding far-addressee symbol.
>
> Is this correct or should be "far-address"?
>
>
> @@ -5336,7 +5336,7 @@ pa_print_operand (FILE *file, rtx x, int code)
> && GET_CODE (XEXP (XEXP (x, 0), 1)) == REG)
> {
> /* Because the REG_POINTER flag can get lost during reload,
> - pa_legitimate_address_p canonicalizes the order of the
> + pa_legitimate_address_p canonizes the order of the
>
> I am not sure about this one and many others. "canonicalize" sounds
> ok to me, so does "canonicalization". "canonize" sounds odd to me.
> For example the following which should change none or both:
>
> -/* Canonicalize the filename NAME by canonicalizing directory
> +/* Canonicalize the filename NAME by canonizing directory
>
> - * Unique vinsn derivates from CALL, ASM, JUMP (for a while) and other
> + * Unique vinsn derivatives from CALL, ASM, JUMP (for a while) and other
>
> Shouldn't this be "derives"?
>
>
> - /* Merge c_expres found or unify live register sets from different
> + /* Merge c_express found or unify live register sets from different
>
> Some lines above in sel-sched.c there is "C_EXPRes". Again, change
> none or both (none seems fine here):
>
oops it was bug, fixed.
>
> - /* Test exponentials and their signs. A buggy lexer is more likely
> + /* Test exponential and their signs. A buggy lexer is more likely
>
> Should both be plural or singular. "exponents" sounds good to me.
>
it is also in string bellow so probably we need change or keep both.
>
> - Roger Sayle <...@eyesopen.com>
> + Roger Sayle <...@eyes open.com>
>
> Don't change email addresses!
bug, fixed