This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [C++ Patch] PR 14263

From: Jason Merrill <jason at redhat dot com>
To: Gabriel Dos Reis <gdr at axiomatics dot org>, Paolo Carlini <paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com>
Cc: "gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>
Date: Fri, 05 Jul 2013 09:38:12 -0700
Subject: Re: [C++ Patch] PR 14263
References: <51D6DB8A dot 7030507 at oracle dot com> <87mwq16mt3 dot fsf at euclid dot axiomatics dot org>

On 07/05/2013 08:36 AM, Gabriel Dos Reis wrote:

I still consider talk of 'static_cast' in this context a non-starter.
However, maybe just saying "convert" would be OK -- though clearly
giving hints of dynamic_cast is much better.

I wouldn't mind mentioning dynamic_cast, along the lines that Gabysuggested in the PR.


Jason

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [C++ Patch] PR 14263
  - From: Paolo Carlini

References:
- [C++ Patch] PR 14263
  - From: Paolo Carlini
- Re: [C++ Patch] PR 14263
  - From: Gabriel Dos Reis

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]