This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
RE: [PING]RE: [patch] cilkplus: Array notation for C patch
- From: "Iyer, Balaji V" <balaji dot v dot iyer at intel dot com>
- To: Jeff Law <law at redhat dot com>, "Joseph S. Myers" <joseph at codesourcery dot com>
- Cc: Jakub Jelinek <jakub at redhat dot com>, Richard Henderson <rth at redhat dot com>, 'Aldy Hernandez' <aldyh at redhat dot com>, 'gcc-patches' <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- Date: Thu, 23 May 2013 04:07:01 +0000
- Subject: RE: [PING]RE: [patch] cilkplus: Array notation for C patch
- References: <BF230D13CA30DD48930C31D409933000333E32EE at FMSMSX101 dot amr dot corp dot intel dot com> <519C3406 dot 5010900 at redhat dot com> <20130522061508 dot GB1377 at tucnak dot redhat dot com> <BF230D13CA30DD48930C31D4099330003A42703B at FMSMSX101 dot amr dot corp dot intel dot com> <519CF021 dot 80700 at redhat dot com> <Pine dot LNX dot 4 dot 64 dot 1305222149530 dot 17655 at digraph dot polyomino dot org dot uk> <519D7ACC dot 5080503 at redhat dot com>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jeff Law [mailto:law@redhat.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2013 10:11 PM
> To: Joseph S. Myers
> Cc: Iyer, Balaji V; Jakub Jelinek; Richard Henderson; 'Aldy Hernandez'; 'gcc-
> patches'
> Subject: Re: [PING]RE: [patch] cilkplus: Array notation for C patch
>
> On 05/22/2013 03:58 PM, Joseph S. Myers wrote:
> >
> > Regarding commonality between OpenMP and Cilk, note also the new C
> > Parallel Language Extensions WG14 study group chaired by Clark Nelson
> > and aiming to propose a standard set of C extensions for parallel
> > programming, announced yesterday on the WG14 reflector. I don't know
> > if anyone here is intending to be involved in that.
> >
> > http://www.open-std.org/mailman/listinfo/cplex
> >
> > I'm OK with the array notation patch as it stands now, although
> > certainly as discussed today there is still some scope for further improvements.
> I'm aware of efforts to standardize the Cilk+ style extensions for ISO C. Is the
> new study group effectively that effort or something different?
Yes, it is part of the Cilk Plus standardization effort for C.
>
>
> jeff