This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
Attaching an updated patch. Thanks Sri On Thu, Apr 25, 2013 at 4:42 PM, Sriraman Tallam <tmsriram@google.com> wrote: > On Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 9:59 PM, Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com> wrote: >> On Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 03:58:06PM -0700, Sriraman Tallam wrote: >>> This patch generates labels for cold function parts that are split when >>> using the option -freorder-blocks-and-partition. The cold label name >>> is generated by suffixing ".cold" to the assembler name of the hot >>> function. >>> >>> This is useful when getting back traces from gdb when the cold function >>> part does get executed. >>> >>> * final.c (final_scan_insn): Generate cold label name by suffixing >>> ".cold" to function's assembler name. >>> * gcc.dg/tree-prof/cold_partition_label.c: New test. >> >> This doesn't honor NO_DOT_IN_LABEL (and NO_DOLLAR_IN_LABEL). > > Fixed, by calling clean_symbol_name > >> Also, don't some function start in cold section and then switch into hot >> section? > > I am not able to generate a test where this happens. However, I fixed > this problem by generating the cold label only when the first function > block is not cold. > > Patch attached, please see if this is ok. > > Thanks > Sri > >> >> Jakub
Attachment:
split_code_label_patch.txt
Description: Text document
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |