This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: Add std::unordered_* C++11 allocator support
- From: Paolo Carlini <paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com>
- To: François Dumont <frs dot dumont at gmail dot com>
- Cc: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely dot gcc at gmail dot com>, "libstdc++ at gcc dot gnu dot org" <libstdc++ at gcc dot gnu dot org>, gcc-patches <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- Date: Thu, 25 Apr 2013 10:52:55 +0200
- Subject: Re: Add std::unordered_* C++11 allocator support
- References: <51438861 dot 9010207 at gmail dot com> <5145A358 dot 4020104 at oracle dot com> <CAH6eHdQjrkLFa2rNZnq9ndkBs4sgZ4EXgxSWW=LX0kOK4i88Ww at mail dot gmail dot com> <515B41F5 dot 4040207 at gmail dot com> <CAH6eHdRHGv9hFzoiVV3bGZ74UhVfawc+qkiQY9dS5CwCdW1p4A at mail dot gmail dot com> <CAH6eHdRuc=r2kSQ-xS921CbUBAfSp29h9apvUC3gjpJt+Z4O8A at mail dot gmail dot com> <5174472E dot 5020502 at gmail dot com>
Hi,
On 04/21/2013 10:08 PM, François Dumont wrote:
Hi
Here is another proposal with:
- No attempt to remove const key
- No attempt to use assignment operator
- noexcept move constructor; I slightly modify a static assertion so
that it checks that _M_bucket_index is noexcept qualified which
depends on the noexcept qualification of the functors involved in
bucket computation
could you please take care of the profile-mode bits too? Let's try to
keep the 3 modes in sync, I noticed only by chance.
Thanks,
Paolo.