This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

RE: [PATCH, AArch64] Compare instruction in shift_extend mode


Hi,

>> I suggest for this one test case either making it compile only and 
>> dropping main() such that the pattern match only looks in the
>> assembled output of the cmp_* functions

The testcase will check only for assembly pattern of the instruction
as per your suggestion.

Please find attached the modified patch let me know if there should
be any further modifications in it.

Thanks,
Naveen

--- gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.md	2013-04-17 11:18:29.453576713 +0530
+++ gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.md	2013-04-17 15:22:36.161492471 +0530
@@ -2311,6 +2311,18 @@
    (set_attr "mode" "<GPI:MODE>")]
 )
 
+(define_insn "*cmp_swp_<optab><ALLX:mode>_shft_<GPI:mode>"
+  [(set (reg:CC_SWP CC_REGNUM)
+	(compare:CC_SWP (ashift:GPI
+			 (ANY_EXTEND:GPI
+			  (match_operand:ALLX 0 "register_operand" "r"))
+			 (match_operand:QI 1 "aarch64_shift_imm_<mode>" "n"))
+	(match_operand:GPI 2 "register_operand" "r")))]
+  ""
+  "cmp\\t%<GPI:w>2, %<GPI:w>0, <su>xt<ALLX:size> %1"
+  [(set_attr "v8type" "alus_ext")
+   (set_attr "mode" "<GPI:MODE>")]
+)
 
 ;; -------------------------------------------------------------------
 ;; Store-flag and conditional select insns
--- gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/cmp.c	1970-01-01 05:30:00.000000000 +0530
+++ gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/cmp.c	2013-04-17 15:23:36.121492125 +0530
@@ -0,0 +1,61 @@
+/* { dg-do compile } */
+/* { dg-options "-O2" } */
+
+int
+cmp_si_test1 (int a, int b, int c)
+{
+  if (a > b)
+    return a + c;
+  else
+    return a + b + c;
+}
+
+int
+cmp_si_test2 (int a, int b, int c)
+{
+  if ((a >> 3) > b)
+    return a + c;
+  else
+    return a + b + c;
+}
+
+typedef long long s64;
+
+s64
+cmp_di_test1 (s64 a, s64 b, s64 c)
+{
+  if (a > b)
+    return a + c;
+  else
+    return a + b + c;
+}
+
+s64
+cmp_di_test2 (s64 a, s64 b, s64 c)
+{
+  if ((a >> 3) > b)
+    return a + c;
+  else
+    return a + b + c;
+}
+
+int
+cmp_di_test3 (int a, s64 b, s64 c)
+{
+  if (a > b)
+    return a + c;
+  else
+    return a + b + c;
+}
+
+int
+cmp_di_test4 (int a, s64 b, s64 c)
+{
+  if (((s64)a << 3) > b)
+    return a + c;
+  else
+    return a + b + c;
+}
+
+/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times "cmp\tw\[0-9\]+, w\[0-9\]+" 2 } } */
+/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times "cmp\tx\[0-9\]+, x\[0-9\]+" 4 } } */

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]